Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Comparison of an individual systematic interview method and the oral health impact profile. Responsiveness and ability of describing treatment effect of oral rehabilitation

Identifieur interne : 005386 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 005385; suivant : 005387

Comparison of an individual systematic interview method and the oral health impact profile. Responsiveness and ability of describing treatment effect of oral rehabilitation

Auteurs : E. B. Özhayat [Danemark] ; K. Gotfredsen [Danemark] ; B. Elverdam [Danemark] ; B. Öwall [Danemark]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:421EB72EBB5EE54DEB85C38C68B5C477E9F21DCB

English descriptors

Abstract

Summary  The Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life – Direct Weighting (SEIQoL‐DW) has shown potential for generating information and measuring Oral Health–Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in oral rehabilitation. The Oral Health Impact Profile‐49 (OHIP‐49) has been widely used in population studies. The purpose of this study was to compare the responsiveness and ability of the SEIQoL‐DW and the OHIP‐49 to qualitatively describe the change following oral rehabilitation. Twenty‐two participants treated with fixed or removable prosthesis were interviewed before and after treatment using the SEIQoL‐DW and the OHIP‐49 questionnaire. The participants rated the subjective perception of change and answered two global oral rating questions. A clinical examination was performed to identify dental status variables. No significant difference was found between pre‐ and post‐treatment SEIQoL‐DW scores. A significant difference between pre‐ and post‐treatment OHIP‐49 scores was found. The SEIQoL‐DW and OHIP‐49 change scores was significantly correlated. The dental status variables such as number of teeth, number of teeth replaced, number of occluding units, type of treatment, extractions and removable dental prosthesis (RDP) before treatment did not influence the change scores. The effect size was low for the SEIQoL‐DW (0·15) and moderate for the OHIP‐49 (0·60). Improvement in subjective perception of change was related to both improvement and deterioration in change scores. More aspects were mentioned in the SEIQoL‐DW compared to the OHIP‐49. Based on the change in overall score and effect size, the SEIQoL‐DW showed a weaker responsiveness than the OHIP‐49. The SEIQoL‐DW, however, described the change more detailed than the OHIP‐49.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02093.x


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Comparison of an individual systematic interview method and the oral health impact profile. Responsiveness and ability of describing treatment effect of oral rehabilitation</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ozhayat, E B" sort="Ozhayat, E B" uniqKey="Ozhayat E" first="E. B." last="Özhayat">E. B. Özhayat</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" sort="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="K." last="Gotfredsen">K. Gotfredsen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Elverdam, B" sort="Elverdam, B" uniqKey="Elverdam B" first="B." last="Elverdam">B. Elverdam</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Owall, B" sort="Owall, B" uniqKey="Owall B" first="B." last="Öwall">B. Öwall</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:421EB72EBB5EE54DEB85C38C68B5C477E9F21DCB</idno>
<date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02093.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/421EB72EBB5EE54DEB85C38C68B5C477E9F21DCB/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002038</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002038</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002038</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001E90</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001E90</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2010:Ozhayat E:comparison:of:an</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">005429</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">005386</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">005386</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Comparison of an individual systematic interview method and the oral health impact profile. Responsiveness and ability of describing treatment effect of oral rehabilitation</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ozhayat, E B" sort="Ozhayat, E B" uniqKey="Ozhayat E" first="E. B." last="Özhayat">E. B. Özhayat</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country>Danemark</country>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Health Science</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" sort="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="K." last="Gotfredsen">K. Gotfredsen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country>Danemark</country>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Health Science</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Elverdam, B" sort="Elverdam, B" uniqKey="Elverdam B" first="B." last="Elverdam">B. Elverdam</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Danemark</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Odense</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Owall, B" sort="Owall, B" uniqKey="Owall B" first="B." last="Öwall">B. Öwall</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country>Danemark</country>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Health Science</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">37</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">8</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="604">604</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="614">614</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2010-08">2010-08</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Additional information</term>
<term>Better ohrqol</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Change score</term>
<term>Change scores</term>
<term>Clinical measures</term>
<term>Clinical practice</term>
<term>Clinical trial</term>
<term>Community dent</term>
<term>Congenital heart disease</term>
<term>Conventional dentures</term>
<term>Copenhagen school</term>
<term>Cue</term>
<term>Cues cues</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental practice</term>
<term>Dental prosthesis</term>
<term>Dental school</term>
<term>Dental status variables</term>
<term>Dentate people</term>
<term>Dentist issues</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Different ways</term>
<term>Effect size</term>
<term>Effect sizes</term>
<term>Groh</term>
<term>Groh question</term>
<term>Groh questions</term>
<term>Health qual life outcomes</term>
<term>Higher change score</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Inclusion criteria</term>
<term>Individual quality</term>
<term>Interview method</term>
<term>Large amount</term>
<term>Life measure</term>
<term>Median number</term>
<term>Negative change</term>
<term>Occluding units</term>
<term>Ohrqol</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral health impact</term>
<term>Oral health status</term>
<term>Oral problems</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Oral region</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Other studies</term>
<term>Overall score</term>
<term>Overall scores</term>
<term>Participant</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Person teeth</term>
<term>Physical impact</term>
<term>Positive change</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Psychological impact</term>
<term>Qualitative differences</term>
<term>Qualitative interview</term>
<term>Rating questions</term>
<term>Rating scores</term>
<term>Regression line</term>
<term>Relative importance</term>
<term>Removable prosthesis</term>
<term>Responsiveness</term>
<term>Same procedure</term>
<term>Sample size</term>
<term>Scatter plot</term>
<term>Small sample size</term>
<term>Standard quality</term>
<term>Standardized instruments</term>
<term>Status variables</term>
<term>Subjective perception</term>
<term>Teeth thoughts</term>
<term>Treatment course</term>
<term>Treatment effect</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Additional information</term>
<term>Better ohrqol</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Change score</term>
<term>Change scores</term>
<term>Clinical measures</term>
<term>Clinical practice</term>
<term>Clinical trial</term>
<term>Community dent</term>
<term>Congenital heart disease</term>
<term>Conventional dentures</term>
<term>Copenhagen school</term>
<term>Cue</term>
<term>Cues cues</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental practice</term>
<term>Dental prosthesis</term>
<term>Dental school</term>
<term>Dental status variables</term>
<term>Dentate people</term>
<term>Dentist issues</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Different ways</term>
<term>Effect size</term>
<term>Effect sizes</term>
<term>Groh</term>
<term>Groh question</term>
<term>Groh questions</term>
<term>Health qual life outcomes</term>
<term>Higher change score</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Inclusion criteria</term>
<term>Individual quality</term>
<term>Interview method</term>
<term>Large amount</term>
<term>Life measure</term>
<term>Median number</term>
<term>Negative change</term>
<term>Occluding units</term>
<term>Ohrqol</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral health impact</term>
<term>Oral health status</term>
<term>Oral problems</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Oral region</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Other studies</term>
<term>Overall score</term>
<term>Overall scores</term>
<term>Participant</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Person teeth</term>
<term>Physical impact</term>
<term>Positive change</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Psychological impact</term>
<term>Qualitative differences</term>
<term>Qualitative interview</term>
<term>Rating questions</term>
<term>Rating scores</term>
<term>Regression line</term>
<term>Relative importance</term>
<term>Removable prosthesis</term>
<term>Responsiveness</term>
<term>Same procedure</term>
<term>Sample size</term>
<term>Scatter plot</term>
<term>Small sample size</term>
<term>Standard quality</term>
<term>Standardized instruments</term>
<term>Status variables</term>
<term>Subjective perception</term>
<term>Teeth thoughts</term>
<term>Treatment course</term>
<term>Treatment effect</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">Summary  The Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life – Direct Weighting (SEIQoL‐DW) has shown potential for generating information and measuring Oral Health–Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in oral rehabilitation. The Oral Health Impact Profile‐49 (OHIP‐49) has been widely used in population studies. The purpose of this study was to compare the responsiveness and ability of the SEIQoL‐DW and the OHIP‐49 to qualitatively describe the change following oral rehabilitation. Twenty‐two participants treated with fixed or removable prosthesis were interviewed before and after treatment using the SEIQoL‐DW and the OHIP‐49 questionnaire. The participants rated the subjective perception of change and answered two global oral rating questions. A clinical examination was performed to identify dental status variables. No significant difference was found between pre‐ and post‐treatment SEIQoL‐DW scores. A significant difference between pre‐ and post‐treatment OHIP‐49 scores was found. The SEIQoL‐DW and OHIP‐49 change scores was significantly correlated. The dental status variables such as number of teeth, number of teeth replaced, number of occluding units, type of treatment, extractions and removable dental prosthesis (RDP) before treatment did not influence the change scores. The effect size was low for the SEIQoL‐DW (0·15) and moderate for the OHIP‐49 (0·60). Improvement in subjective perception of change was related to both improvement and deterioration in change scores. More aspects were mentioned in the SEIQoL‐DW compared to the OHIP‐49. Based on the change in overall score and effect size, the SEIQoL‐DW showed a weaker responsiveness than the OHIP‐49. The SEIQoL‐DW, however, described the change more detailed than the OHIP‐49.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Danemark</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Hovedstaden</li>
</region>
<settlement>
<li>Copenhague</li>
</settlement>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Danemark">
<region name="Hovedstaden">
<name sortKey="Ozhayat, E B" sort="Ozhayat, E B" uniqKey="Ozhayat E" first="E. B." last="Özhayat">E. B. Özhayat</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Elverdam, B" sort="Elverdam, B" uniqKey="Elverdam B" first="B." last="Elverdam">B. Elverdam</name>
<name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" sort="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="K." last="Gotfredsen">K. Gotfredsen</name>
<name sortKey="Owall, B" sort="Owall, B" uniqKey="Owall B" first="B." last="Öwall">B. Öwall</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005386 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 005386 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:421EB72EBB5EE54DEB85C38C68B5C477E9F21DCB
   |texte=   Comparison of an individual systematic interview method and the oral health impact profile. Responsiveness and ability of describing treatment effect of oral rehabilitation
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022